Achor hecta
One of the central predictions of nutrient addition is an increased production of fish through bottom-up increases in invertebrate abundance. Nutrient supplementation in oligotrophic streams is proposed as a means of mitigating losses of marine-derived subsidies from declining or extirpated populations of anadromous fishes. Consider lessons learned about supplementation and density dependence in anadromous salmonids when planning future actions to propagate and translocate (i.e., supplement) lamprey within the Basin.Initiate studies to gather information about current densities of Pacific lamprey in the Basin and to learn about density dependent processes that might thwart efforts to promote their recovery.Consider habitat capacity and the probable effects of density on growth and survival when developing stocking programs to conserve white sturgeon.Consider the probable effects of density on survival, emigration, growth, and size/age at maturity when developing angling regulations to achieve conservation and recreational goals.Recognize that carrying capacity for non-anadromous salmonids can be reduced through competitive interactions with stocked hatchery trout or invasive non-native trout.Recognize that carrying capacity for non-anadromous salmonids can be increased by restoring in-stream structure and riparian vegetation.Improve capabilities to evaluate density dependent growth, dispersal, and survival by addressing primary data gaps.Balance hatchery supplementation with the Basin’s capacity to support existing natural populations by considering density effects on the abundance and productivity of natural origin salmon.Establish biological spawning escapement objectives that account for density dependence.Account for density effects when planning and evaluating habitat restoration actions.Understanding density dependence (e.g., stock-recruitment relationships) in salmon populations is central to evaluating responses to recovery actions and for setting spawning escapement goals that will sustain fisheries and a resilient ecosystem.Identifying mechanisms that contribute to density dependence in particular habitats and life stages-such as limitations in spawning habitat, rearing habitat or food supply, or predator-prey interactions-can help to guide habitat restoration and population recovery actions.By creating unintended density effects on natural populations, supplementation may fail to boost natural origin returns despite its effectiveness at increasing total spawning abundance. Total smolt densities may be higher now than historically. Hatchery releases account for a large proportion of current salmon abundance.Density dependence was also observed in some less altered watersheds. Roughly one-third of the Basin is no longer accessible to anadromous salmon, and continuing changes to environmental conditions stemming from climate change, chemicals, and intensified land use appear to have further diminished the capacity of habitat that remains accessible. Evidence for strong density dependence at current abundance suggests that habitat capacity has been greatly diminished.The ISAB concludes that historical all-species capacity was likely in the range of 5 to 9 million adult fish per year, which is less than previously published estimates (e.g., 7.5 to 16 million adults per year) but still much higher than current abundance levels (~2.3 million fish per year during 2000-2012). The ISAB reanalyzed the admittedly limited historical data to better evaluate the potential capacity for salmon and steelhead in the Columbia Basin before hydrosystem development.
This fact raises the question: Why is density dependence more evident than expected at low abundances? Density dependence is now evident in most of the ESA-listed populations examined and appears strong enough to constrain their recovery. Many salmon populations throughout the interior of the Columbia River Basin are experiencing reduced productivity associated with recent increases in natural spawning abundance, even though current abundance remains far below historical levels.In response to an assignment from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, NOAA Fisheries, and Columbia River Indian tribes, the Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB) reviewed the implications of density dependence in fish populations in the Columbia River Basin.